第5章

类别:其他 作者:佚名字数:15423更新时间:18/12/14 10:53:25
allpoliticalwriting,withVoltaireandWebster。 NearthatsamefieldmustliemanyofthoseessaysincriticismofwhichProfessorDowdenspeaks。Thiswhichweomit,thisliteratureofknowledge,ispowerfulliterature,thoughitsmainpurposeisnottomove,buttoteach。 Weareonlyreducingourfieldsothatwecansurveyit。Forourusesjustnowweshallfindpureliteraturetakingthethreestandardforms:thepoem,theessay,andthestory。ItistheinfluenceoftheEnglishBibleonthislargefieldofliteraturewhichwearetoobserve。 Justforsafety\'ssake,acceptanothernarrowingofthefield。TheeffectoftheBibleanditsreligiousteaching,onthewriterhimselfisaseparatestudy,andisforthemostpartleftoutofconsideration。ItsoundscorrectwhenMiltonsays:\"HewhowouldnotbefrustrateofhisPowertowritewelloughthimselftobeatruepoem。\"ButthereisMiltonhimselftodealwith;irreproachableinmorals,thereareyettheunhappyyearsofhisyoungwifetotroubleus,andtherewerehisdaughters,whowerenotatpeacewithhim,andwhomaftertheirserviceinhisblindnessheyetstigmatizesinhiswillas\"undutifulchildren。\"Then,ifyouthinkofShelleyorByron,youaretroubledbytheirlives;orevenCarlyle,theverymasteroftheVictorianera——onewouldnotliketoscanhislifeaccordingtothelawsoftruepoetry。 ThenthereisColeridge,fallingapreytoopiumuntil,asyearscame,conscienceandwillseemedtogo。OnlyaveryardentScotwillfeelthathecandefendRobertBurnsatallpoints,andwewouldbestrangeAmericansifwefeltthatEdgarAllenPoewasamodelofpropriety。Thatisalargeandinterestingfield,buttheBibleseemseventogainpowerasabook-makingbookwhenitlaysholdonthebook-makingproclivitiesofmenwhoarenotpreparedtoyieldtoitspersonalpower。Theymaygetawayfromitasreligion;theydonotgetawayfromitasliterature。 ThefirstandmostnotablefactregardingtheinfluenceoftheBibleonEnglishliteratureistheremarkableextentofthatinfluence。Itisliterallyeverywhere。IfeveryBibleinanyconsiderablecityweredestroyed,theBookcouldberestoredinallitsessentialpartsfromthequotationsontheshelvesofthecitypubliclibrary。Thereareworks,coveringalmostallthegreatliterarywriters,devotedespeciallytoshowinghowmuchtheBiblehasinfluencedthem。 TheliteraryeffectoftheKingJamesversionatfirstwaslessthanitssocialeffect;butinthatveryfactliesastrikingliteraryinfluence。 ForalongtimeitformedvirtuallythewholeliteraturewhichwasreadilyaccessibletoordinaryEnglishmen。Wegetourphrasesfromathousandbooks。Thecommontalkofanintelligentmanshowstheeffectofmanyauthorsuponhisthinking。Ourfathersgottheirphrasesfromonegreatbook。Theirwritingandtheirspeakingshowtheeffectofthatbook。 Itisastudybyitself,andyetitistruethatworldliteratureis,asProfessorMoultonputsit,theautobiographyofcivilization。\"Anationalliteratureisareflectionofthenationalhistory。\" Booksasbooksreflecttheirauthors。Asliteraturetheyreflectthepublicopinionwhichgivesthemindorsement。When,therefore,publicopinion:keepsaliveacertaingroupofbooks,thereistestimonynotsimplytothosebooks,buttothepublicopinionwhichhaspreservedthem。Thehistoryofpopularestimatesofliteratureisitselfmostinteresting。Ontheotherhand,somewritershavebeenamusinglyoverestimated。 NodoubtEdwardFitzgerald,whogaveusthe\"RubaiyatofOmarKhayyam\"didsomeotherdesirablework;butProfessorMoultonquotesthisparagraphfromapopularlifeofFitzgerald,publishedinDublin:\"NotGreeceofoldinherpalmiestdays——theGreeceofHomerandDemosthenes,ofEschylus,Euripides,andSophocles,ofPericles,Leonidas,andAlcibiades,ofSocrates,Plato,andAristotle,ofSolonandLycurgus,ofApellesandPraxiteles——noteventhisGreece,prolificasshewasinsagesandheroes,canboastsuchalengthybead-rollasIrelandcanofnamesimmortalinhistory!\" But\"thiswasforIrishconsumption。\"Andpopularopinionandevencriticalopinionhassometimesgonefarastrayinitsdestructivetendency。TherewereauthoritativecriticswhodeclaredthatWordsworth,Shelley,andColeridgewrote\"unintelligiblenonsense。\"GeorgeMeredith\'sstyle,especiallyinhispoetry,wascountedsobadthatit——wasnotworthreading。 WeareallnearenoughtheBrowningepochtorecallhowtheobscurityofhisstyleimpressedsomeandoppressedothers。AlfredAustin,in1869,saidthat\"Mr。Tennysonhasnosoundpretensionstobecalledagreatpoet。\" Contemporarypublicopinionisseldomafinalgaugeofstrengthforapieceofliterature。Ittakesthetestoftime。Howmanybookswehaveseencomeonthestageandthenpassoffagain!Yetthebooksthathavestayedonthestagehavebeenkepttherebypublicopinionexpressingitselfinthelongrun。ThesocialinfluenceoftheKingJamesversion,creatingapublictasteforcertaintypesofliterature,tendedtoproducethematonce。 EnglishliteratureinthesethreehundredyearshasfoundintheBiblethreeinfluentialelements:style,language,andmaterial。 First,thestyleoftheKingJamesversionhasinfluencedEnglishliteraturemarkedly。ProfessorGardineropensoneofhisessayswiththedictumthat\"inallstudyofEnglishliterature,iftherebeanyoneaxiomwhichmaybeacceptedwithoutquestion,itisthattheultimatestandardofEnglishprosestyleissetbytheKingJamesversionoftheBible。\"[1]Youalmostmeasurethestrengthofwritingbyitsagreementwiththepredominanttraitsofthisversion。 Carlyle\'sweakestworksarethosethatlosethehonestsimplicityofitsstyleinaforcedturgidityandaffectedroughness。HisHeroesandHeroWorshiporhisFrenchRevolutionshowshisdistinctivestyle,andyetshowstheinfluenceofthissimplerstyle,whilehisFredericktheGreatisalmostimpossiblebecausehehasgivenfullplaytohisbrokenanddisconnectedsentences。Ontheotherhand,Macaulayfailsusmostinhisstrivingforeffect,makingnicebalanceofsentences,straininghis\"either-or,\" orhis\"while-one-was-doing-this-the-other-was- doing-that。\"Thenhissentencesgrowinvolved,andhisparagraphslengthen,andheswingsawayfromthestyleoftheKingJamesversion。 \"OnecansaythatifanywritingdepartsveryfarfromthecharacteristicsoftheEnglishBibleitisnotgoodEnglishwriting。\" [1]AtlanticMonthly,May,1900,p。684。 ThesecondelementwhichEnglishliteraturefindsintheBibleisitsLANGUAGE。ThewordsoftheBiblearethefamiliaronesoftheEnglishtongue,andhavebeenkeptfamiliarbytheuseoftheBible。Theresultisthat\"thepathofliteratureliesparalleltothatofreligion。Theyareoldanddearcompanions,brethrenindeedofoneblood;notalwaysagreeing,tobesure; squabblingratherintruebrotherlyfashionnowandthen;occasionallyfallingoutveryseriouslyandbitterly;butstillinterdependentandnecessarytoeachother。\"[1]YearsagoawriterremarkedthateverystudentofEnglishliterature,orofEnglishspeech,findsthreeworksorsubjectsreferredto,orquotedfrom,morefrequentlythanothers。ThesearetheBible,talesofGreekandRomanmythology,andAesop\'sFables。Ofthesethree,certainlytheBiblefurnishesthelargestnumberofreferences。Thereisreasonforthat。Awriterwantsanaudience。Veryfewmencanclaimtobeindependentofthepublicforwhichtheywrite。ThereisnothingthepublicwillbemoreapttounderstandandappreciatequicklythanapassingreferencetotheEnglishBible。SoitcomesaboutthatwhenDickensisdescribingtheinjusticeoftheMurdstonestolittleDavidCopperfield,hecanputthewholematterbeforeusinaparenthesis: \"ThoughtherewasOneoncewhosetachildinthemidstofthedisciples。\"Dickensknewthathisreaderswouldatoncecatchthemeaningofthatreference,andwouldfeelthecontrastbetweenthescenehewasdescribingandthatsimplescene。TakeanyofthegreatbooksofliteratureandblackoutthephraseswhichmanifestlycomedirectlyfromtheEnglishBible,andyouwouldmarkthembeyondrecovery。 [1]Chapman,EnglishLiteratureinAccountwithReligion。 ButEnglishliteraturehasfoundmoreofitsmaterialintheBiblethananythingelse。Ithaslookedthereforitscharacters,itsillustrations,itssubject-matter。Weshallsee,asweconsiderindividualwriters,howmanyoftheirtitlesandcompleteworksaresuggestedbytheBible。 ItisinterestingtoseehowoneideaoftheScripturewillappearandreappearamongmanywriters。Takeoneillustration。TheFauststoryisanefforttomakeconcreteoneverseofScripture: \"Whatshallitprofitamanifheshallgainthewholeworldandlosehisownsoul?\" ProfessorMoultonremindsusthattheFaustlegendappearedfirstintheMiddleAges。InearlyEnglish,Marlowehasit,CalderonputitintoSpanish,themostfamiliarformofitisGoethe\'s,whilePhilipBaileyhascalledhisaccountofitFestus。Ineachofthoseformsthesameideaoccurs。Amansellshissoultothedevilforthegainingofwhatistohimtheworld。ThatisoneofagoodmanyideaswhichtheBiblehasgiventoliterature。Theprodigalsonhasbeenanotherprolificsourceofliterarywriting。Theguidingstarisanother。Otherswillreadilycometomind。 Withthatsimplebackgroundletourmindsmovedownthecourseofliteraryhistory。Style,language,material——wewilleasilythinkhowmuchofeachtheBiblehasgiventoallourgreatwritersiftheirnamesareonlymentioned。Therearefourgroupsofthesewriters。 1。TheJacobean,whowrotewhenandjustafterourversionwasmade。 2。TheGeorgian,whogracedthereignsofthekingswhosenametheperiodbears。 3。TheVictorian。 4。TheAmerican。 Thereisanattractivefifthgroupcomprisingourpresent-dayworkersintherealmofpureliterature,butwemustomitthemandgiveourattentiontonamesthatarestarred。 ItisfamiliarthatinthetimeofElizabeth,\"Englandbecameanestofsingingbirds。\"InthefiftyyearsafterthefirstEnglishtheaterwaserected,themiddleofElizabeth\'sreign,fiftydramaticpoetsappeared,manyofthefirstorder。Someweredistinctlyirreligious,asweremanyofthepeoplewhoselivestheytouched。 SuchmenasFord,Marlowe,Massinger,Webster,Beaumont,andFletcherstandlikeachorusaroundShakespeareandBenJonsonasleaders。 AsTaineputsit:\"Theysingthesamepiecetogether,andattimesthechorusisequaltothesolo;butonlyattimes。\"[1]Culturedpeopleto-dayknowthenamesofmostofthesewriters,butnotmuchelse,anditdoesnotheavilyserveourargumenttosaythattheyfeltthePuritaninfluence;buttheyalldidfeeliteitherdirectlyorbyreaction。 [1]HistoryofEnglishLiterature,chap。iii。 EdmundSpenserandhisfriend,SirPhilipSidney,hadclosedtheirworkbeforetheKingJamesversionappeared,yettheFaerieQueeneinitsreligioustheoryisPuritantothecore,andSidneyisbestrememberedbyhisparaphrasesofScripture。TheinfluenceofbothwasevengreaterintheJacobeanthanintheirownperiod。 ItishardlyfaireventonotetheElizabethanShakespeareasundertheinfluenceoftheKingJamesversion。TheBibleinfluencedhimmarkedly,butitwastheGenevanversionpreparedduringtheexileofthescholarsunderBloodyMary,ortheBishops\'BiblepreparedunderElizabeth。Thoseversionswerefamiliarashouseholdfactstohim。\"NowriterhasassimilatedthethoughtsandreproducedthewordsofHolyScripturemorecopiouslythanShakespeare。\"Dr。Furnivallsaysthat\"heissaturatedwiththeBiblestory,\"andacenturyagoCapelLloftsaidquaintlythatShakespeare\"haddeeplyimbibedtheScriptures。\"ButtheKingJamesversionappearedonlyfiveyearsbeforehisdeath,anditisinsomesensefairertosaythatShakespeareandtheKingJamesversionareformedbythesameinfluenceastotheirEnglishstyle。TheBishopofSt。 AndrewsevendevotesthefirstpartofhisbookonShakespeareandtheBibletoastudyofparallelsbetweenthetwoinpeculiarformsofspeech,andthinksit\"probablethatourtranslatorsof1611owedasmuchtoShakespeareas,orratherfarmorethan,heowedtothem。\"[1] Itisgenerallyagreedthatonlytwoofhisworkswerewrittenafterourversionappeared。SeveralotherwritershavedevotedseparatevolumestonotingthefrequentusebyShakespeareofBiblicalphrasesandallusionsandcharacterstakenfromearlyversions。Itisaverytemptingfield,andwepassitbyonlybecauseitishardlyintherangeofthestudywearenowmaking。 [1]Wordsworth,Shakespeare\'sKnowledgeandUseoftheBible,p。 9。 When,however,wecometoJohnMilton(1608-1674),werememberhewasonlythreeyearsoldwhenourversionwasissued;thatwhenatfifteen,anundergraduateinCambridge,hemadehisfirstparaphrases,castingtwoofthePsalmsintometer,theversionheusedwasthisfamiliarone。AbiographersayshebeganthedayalwayswiththereadingofScriptureandkepthismemorydeeplychargedwithitsphrases。 InlaterlifethemorningchapterwasgenerallyfromtheHebrew,andwasfollowedbyanhourofsilenceformeditation,anexercisewhoseinfluencenoman\'sstylecouldescape。AsawriterhemovedsteadilytowardtheScriptureandthereligiousteachingwhichitbroughthisage。Hisearlierwritingisagroupofpoemslargelysecular,whichyetshowinphrasesandexpressionsmuchoftheinfluenceofhisboyhoodstudyoftheBible,aswellasthefamiliaruseofmythology。Thememorialpoem\"Lycidas,\" forexample,containsthemuch-quotedreferencetoPeterandhistwokeys—— \"LastcameandlastdidgoThepilotoftheGalileanlake; Twomassykeysheboreofmetalstwain,(Thegoldenopes,theironshutsamain)。\" Butafterthesepoemscametheperiodofhisprose,theworkwhichhesupposedwastheabidingworkofhislife。GeorgeWilliamCurtistoldafriendthatourcivilwarchangedhisownliterarystyle:\"ThatrousedmetoseethatI hadnorighttospendmylifeinliteraryleisure。 IfeltthatImustthrowmyselfintothestruggleforfreedomandtheUnion。Ibegantolectureandtowrite。Thestyletookcareofitself。 ButIfancyitismoresolidthanitwasthirtyyearsago。\"ThatiswhathappenedtoMiltonwhentheprotectoratecame。[1]Itmadehisstylemoresolid。Hedidnotmeantoliveasapoet。 Hefeltthathisbestenergieswerebeingputintohisessaysindefenseofliberty,onthefreedomofthepressandonthejusticeofthebeheadingofCharles,inwhichservicehesacrificedhissight。AllofitisshotthroughwithScripturequotationsandarguments,andsomeofit,atleast,isintheveryspiritofScripture。Thepleaforlargerfreedomofdivorceissuedplainlyfromhisownbitterexperience;buthismainargumentrootsinafewBibletextstakenoutoftheirconnectionandurgedwithnoshadowofquestionoftheirauthority。Indeed,whenhecomestohismorereligiousessays,hisheavyargumentisthatthereshouldbenoreligionpermittedinEnglandwhichisnotdrawndirectlyfromtheBible;which,therefore,heurgesmustbecommonpropertyforallthepeople。 Thereisacuriousbitofevidencethatthemenofhisowntimedidnotrealizehispowerasapoet。InPierreBayle\'scriticalsurveyoftheliteratureofthetime,hecallsMilton\"thefamousapologistfortheexecutionofCharlesI。,\"who\"meddledinpoetryandseveralofwhosepoemssawthelightduringhislifeorafterhisdeath!\"Forallthat,Miltonwasonlyworkingontowardhisrealpower,andhispowerwastobeshowninhisservicetoreligion。Histhreegreatpoems,intheorderoftheirvalue,are,ofcourse,\"ParadiseLost,\"\"SamsonAgonistes,\" and\"ParadiseRegained。\"WhoeverknowsanythingofMiltonknowsthesethreeandknowstheyareScripturalfromfirsttolastinphrase,inallusion,and,inpartatleast,inidea。Thereisnottimeforextendedillustration。Oneinstancemaystandforall,whichshallillustratehowMilton\'smindwaslikeagardenwheretheseedsofScripturecametoflowerandfruit。HewilltakeonephrasefromtheBibleandletitgrowtoapagein\"ParadiseLost。\"Hereisanillustrationwhichcomesreadilytohand。IntheGenesisitissaidthat\"thespiritofGodmovedonthefaceofthewaters。\"Theverbsuggeststheideaofbrooding。Thereisonlyoneotherpossiblereference(Psalmxxiv:9。) whichisincludedinthisstatementwhichMiltonmakesoutofthatbriefwordintheGenesis: \"OnthewaterycalmHisbroadeningwingstheSpiritofGodoutspread,Andvitalvirtueinfused,andvitalwarmthThroughoutthefluidmass,butdownwardpurgedTheblacktartareouscoldinfernaldregs,Adversetolife;thenformed,thencon-globed,Likethingstolike;theresttoseveralplaceDisparted,andbetweenspunouttheair—— Andearthself-balancedonhercenterswung。\" [1]Strong,TheTheologyofthePoets。 AnyonefamiliarwithMiltonwillrecognizethatasatypicalinstanceofthewayinwhichaseedideafromtheScripturecomestoflowerandfruitinhim。TheresultisthatmorepeoplehavetheirideasaboutheavenandhellfromMiltonthanfromtheBible,thoughtheydonotknowit。 ItseemshardlyfairtouseJohnBunyan(1628-1688)asanillustrationoftheinfluenceoftheEnglishBibleonliterature,becausehischiefworkiscomposedsolargelyinthelanguageofScripture。Pilgrim\'sProgressisthemostwidelyreadbookintheEnglishlanguageaftertheBible。Itsphrases,itsnames,itsmatterareeitherdirectlyorindirectlytakenfromtheBible。Ithasgivenusalonglistofphraseswhicharepartofourliteraryandreligiouscapital。Thackeraytookthemottoofoneofhisbest-knownbooksfromtheBible;butthetitle,VanityFair,comesfromPilgrim\'sProgress。 Whenadiscouragedmansaysheis\"inthesloughofdespond,\"hequotesBunyan;andwhenapopularevangelisttellsthepeoplethattheburdenofsinwillrollawayiftheylookatthecross,\"accordingtotheBible,\"heoughttosayaccordingtoBunyan。ButallthiswasonlytheoutcomeofthefamiliarityofBunyanwiththeScripture。Itwasalmostallhedidknowinaliteraryway。Macaulaysaysthat\"heknewnolanguagebuttheEnglishasitwasspokenbythecommonpeople;hehadstudiednogreatmodelofcomposition,withtheexceptionofournobletranslationoftheBible。 Butofthathisknowledgewassuchthathemighthavebeencalledalivingconcordance。\"[1] [1]HistoryofEngland,vol。III。,p。220。 Afterthesethree——Shakespeare,Milton,andBunyan——thereappearedanotherthree,verymuchtheirinferiorsandhavingmuchlessinfluenceonliteraryhistory。ImeanDryden,Addison,andPope。ItisnotnecessarytocredittheScripturewithmuchofDryden\'sspirit,norwithmuchofhisstyle,andcertainlynotwithhisattitudetowardhisfellows;butitisaconstantsurpriseinreadingDrydentodiscoverhowfamiliarhewaswiththeKingJamesversion。 WalterScottinsiststhatDrydenwasatheartserious,that\"hisindelicacywasliketheforcedimpudenceofabashfulman。\"Thatisgenerousjudgment。Butthereisthistobesaid:ashegrowsmoreserioushefallsmoreintoBiblewords。Ifhewritesapoliticalpamphlethecallsit\"AbsalomandAhithophel。\" InitheholdsthemenofthedayuptoscornunderBiblenames。TheyareZimriandShimei,andthelike。Whenheisfallingintobitterestsatire,hiswritingaboundsintheseBiblicalallusionswhichcouldbemadeonlybyonewhowasveryfamiliarwiththeBook。Quotationscannotbeabundant,ofcourse,butthereisagreatdealofthissortofthing: \"Sinking,helefthisdruggetrobebehind,Borneupwardbyasubterraneanwind,Themantlefelltotheyoungprophet\'spart,Withdoubleportionofhisfather\'sart。\" InhisEpistlesthereismuchofthesamesort。 WhenhewritestoCongrevehespeaksofthefathers,andsays: \"Their\'swasthegiantracebeforetheflood。\" Fartheronhesays: \"Ourbuilderswerewithwantofgeniuscurst,Thesecondtemplewasnotlikethefirst。\" NowDrydenmayhavebeen,asMacaulaysaid,an\"illustriousrenegade,\"butallhiswritingshowstheinfluenceofthelanguageandtheideasoftheKingJamesversion。Wheneverwesingthe\"VeniCreator\"wesingJohnDryden。 SowesingAddisonintheparaphraseofScripture,whichHaydn\'smusichasmadefamiliar: \"Thespaciousfirmamentonhigh,Withalltheblueetherealsky。\" WhileDrydenyieldedtohistimes,Addisondidnot,andtheSpectatorbecamenotonlyaliterarybutamoralpower。Intheefforttomakeitsohewasthrownbackonthelargestmoralinfluenceoftheday,theBible,andthroughouttheSpectatorandthroughallofAddison\'swritingyoufindonallproperoccasionstheBiblepressedtothefront。HereagainTaineputsitstrikingly:\"Itisnosmallthingtomakemoralityfashionable;Addisondidit,anditremainsfashionable。\" Ifwespeakofsinging,wemayrememberthatwesingthehymnofevenpoorlittledwarfedinvalidAlexanderPope。HewasborntheyearBunyandied,bornatcross-purposeswiththeworld。Hecouldwriteabittersatire,likethe\"Dunciad\";hecouldgivetheworldTheIliadandTheOdysseyinsuchEnglishthatweknowthemfarbetterthanintheGreekofHomer; butinthoseraremomentswhenhewasathisbetterselfhewouldwritehisgreaterpoem,\"TheMessiah\",inwhichthemovementofScriptureisoutlinedasitcouldbeonlybyonewhoknewtheEnglishBible。Andwhenwesing—— \"Rise,crownedwithlight,imperialSalem,rise\"—— itisworthwhiletorealizethatthevoicethatfirstsungitwasthatoftheirritablelittlepoetwhofoundsomeofhisscantcomfortinthegrandwordsandphrasesandideasofourEnglishBible。 Withthesesix——Shakespeare,Milton,Bunyan,Dryden,Addison,andPope——thecourseoftheJacobeanliteratureissufficientlymeasured。 Therearemanylessernames,butthesearetheoneswhichmadeitanepochinliterature,andtheseareattheirbestunderthepoweroftheBible。 IntheGeorgiangroupweneedtocallonlyfivegreatnameswhichhavehadcreativeinfluenceinliterature。Ordinarycultureinliteraturewillincludesomeacquaintancewitheachofthem。IntheorderoftheirdeaththeyareShelley(1829。),Byron(1824),Coleridge(1831),WalterScott(1832),andWordsworth(1850)。 Thelastlongoutlivedtheothers;buthebelongswiththem,becausehewasbornearlierthananyotherinthegroupanddidhischiefworkintheirtimeandbeforethelatergroupappeared。ExceptWordsworth,alltheseweregonebeforeQueenVictoriacametothethronein1837。Threeothernamescouldbecalled: Keats,RobertBurns,andCharlesLamb。Allwouldillustratewhatwearestudying。KeatsleastofallandBurnsmost。TheyareomittedherenotbecausetheydidnotfeeltheinfluenceoftheEnglishBible,notbecausetheydonotconstantlyshowitsinfluence,butbecausetheyarenotsocreativeastheothers;theyhavenotsoinfluencedthecurrentofliterature。Atanyrate,thefivenamedwillrepresentworthilyandwithsufficientcompletenesstheGeorgianperiodofEnglishliterature。 NothingcouldrevealmoreclearlythanthislisthowwearedistinguishingtheBibleasliteraturefromtheBibleasanauthoritativebookinmorals。OnewouldmuchdisliketocredittheBiblewithanypartofthepersonallifeofShelleyorByron。Theywerefriends;they,weregeniuses;buttheywerebothbadlyafflictedwithcommonmoralleprosy。Itisplayingwithmoralstoexcuseeitherofthembecausehewasagenius。Nothinginthegeniusofeitherdemandedorwasservedbythecourseofcheapimmoralitywhichbothpractised。ItwasnotbecauseShelleywasageniusthathemarriedHarrietWestbrook,thenranawaywithMaryGodwin,thentriedtogetthetwotobecomefriendsandneighborsuntilhisownwifecommittedsuicide;itwasnothisgeniusthatmadehimyieldtotheinfluenceofEmiliaVivianiandwriteherthepoem\"Epipsychidion,\"tellingherandtheworldthathe\"wasneverattachedtothatgreatsectwhobelievedthateachoneshouldselectoutofthecrowdamistressorafriend\"andlettherestgo。Thatwasnotgenius,thatwasjustcommonpassion;andourdivorcecourtsarefullofShelleysofthattype。 SoByron\'spersonalimmoralityisnottobeexplainednorexcusedonthegroundofhisgenius。ItwasnotgeniusthatledhimsoastrayinEnglandthathiswifehadtodivorcehim,andthatpublicopiniondrovehimoutoftheland。ItwasnothisgeniusthatsenthimtovisitShelleyandhismistressatLakeGenevaandseducetheirguest,sothatsheborehimadaughter,thoughshewasneverhiswife。ItwasnotgeniusthatmadehimpickupstillanothercompanionoutofseveralinItalyandlivewithherinimmoralrelation。InthenameofcommondecencyletnoonestandupforShelleyandByronintheirpersonalcharacters!Therearenottwomorallaws,oneforgeniusesandoneforcommonpeople。Byron,atanyrate,wasneverdeceivedabouthimself,neverblamedhisgeniusnorhisconscienceforhiswrong。Thesearestrikinglinesin\"ChildeHarold,\"inwhichhedisclaimsallrighttosympathy,because,\"ThethornswhichIhavereapedareofthetreeIplanted,——theyhavetornmeandIbleed。 Ishouldhaveknownwhatfruitwouldspringfromsuchatree。\" Shelley\'swifewouldnotsaythatforhim。 \"InallShelleydid,\"shesays,\"heatthetimeofdoingitbelievedhimselfjustifiedtohisownconscience。\"Well,somuchtheworseforShelley!Geniusesarenottheonlymenwhocanfindgoodreasonfordoingwhattheywanttodo。OneofShelley\'scriticssuggeststhatthetroublewashisintroductionintopersonalconductoftheimaginationwhichheoughttohavesavedforhiswriting。PerhapswemightexplainByron\'smisconductbyremindingourselvesofhisclub-foot,andapplyingonecodeofmoralstomenwithclub-feetandanothertomenwithnormalfeet。 IfwespeakoftheinfluenceoftheBibleonthesemen,itmustbeontheirliterarywork; andwhenwefinditthere,itbecomespeculiarmarkofitspower。Theyhadlittlesenseofitasmorallaw。Theirconsciencesapproveditandcondemnedthemselves,orelsetheirdelicateliterarytastesenseditasabookofpower。 ThisisnotablytrueofShelley。WhenhewasstillastudentinOxfordhecommittedhimselftotheopinionofanotherwriter,that\"themindcannotbelieveintheexistenceofGod。\"Hetriestoworkthatoutfullyinhisnoteson\"QueenMab。\"Whenhewashardlyyetofagehehimselfwrotethat\"ThegeniusofhumanhappinessmustteareveryleaffromtheaccursedBookofGod,eremancanreadtheinscriptiononitsheart。\"HeoncesaidthathishighestdesirewasthatthereshouldbeamonumenttohimselfsomewhereintheAlpswhichshouldbeonlyagreatstonewithitsfacesmoothedandthisshortinscriptioncutinit,\"PercyByssheShelley,Atheist。\" ItwouldseemthatwhateverShelleydrewofstrengthorinspirationfromtheBiblewouldbebywayofreaction;butitisnotso。Howeverhemayhavehatedthe\"accursedBookofGod,\" hiswifetellsinhernoteon\"TheRevoltofIslam\" thatShelley\"debatedwhetherheshoulddevotehimselftopoetryormetaphysics,\"and,resolvingontheformer,he\"educatedhimselfforit,engaginghimselfinthestudyofthepoetsofGreece,England,andItaly。Tothese,maybeadded,\"shegoeson,\"aconstantperusalofportionsoftheOldTestament,theBookofPsalms,Job,Isaiah,andothers,thesublimepoetryofwhichfilledhimwithdelight。\"Notonlydidhecatchthespiritofthatpoetry,butitsphraseshauntedhismemory。Inhisbestprosework,whichhecalledADefenseofPoetry,thereisaninterestingrevelationoftheinfluenceofhisBiblereadinguponhim。Towardtheendoftheessaythesetwosentencesoccur:\"Itisinconsistentwiththisdivisionofoursubjecttocitelivingpoets,butposterityhasdoneamplejusticetothegreatnamesnowreferredto。Theirerrorshavebeenweighedandfoundtohavebeendustinthebalance;iftheirsinsareasscarlet,theyarenowwhiteassnow;theyhavebeenwashedinthebloodofthemediatorandredeemer,Time。\"Thereisnomoreeloquentpassageintheessaythantheoneofwhichthisispart,andyetitisfullofallusiontothisBookfromwhichallpagesmustbetorn!Evenin\"QueenMab\"hemakesAhasuerus,thewanderingJew,recounttheBiblestoryinsuchbroadoutlinesascouldbegivenonlybyamanwhowasfamiliarwithit。WhenShelleywasinItalyandthewordcametohimofthemassacreatManchester,hewrotehis\"MasqueofAnarchy。\" Therearefewmoremelodiouslinesofhiswritingthanthosewhichoccurinthislongpoeminthesectionregardingfreedom。Fourofthoselinesareoftenquoted。TheyareattheveryheartofShelley\'sbestwork。Addressingfreedom,hesays: \"Thouartlove:therichhavekissedThyfeet,and,likehimfollowingChrist,Gavetheirsubstancetothefree,Andthroughtheroughworldfollowthee。\" PageafterpageofShelleyrevealsthesehalf- consciousreferencestotheBible。Thereweretwosourcesfromwhichhereceivedhispassionatedemocracy。OnewasthetreatmenthereceivedatEton,andlateratOxford;theotherishisfrequentreadingoftheEnglishBible,eventhoughhewasinthespiritofrebellionagainstmuchofitsteaching。InBrowning\'sessayonShelley,hereachestheamazingconclusionthat\"hadShelleylived,hewouldfinallyhaverangedhimselfwiththeChristians,\"andseekstojustifyitbyshowingthathewasmovingstraighttowardthepositionsofPaulandofDavid。Someofusmaynotseesuchrapidapproach,butthatShelleyfeltthedrawingofGodintheuniverseisplainenough。 TheinfluenceoftheBibleisstillmoremarkedonByron。HespenthischildhoodyearsatAberdeen。TherehisnursetrainedhimintheBible;and,thoughhedidnotlivebyit,heneverlosthisloveforit,norhisknowledgeofit。Hetellsofhisownexperienceinthisway: \"Iamagreatreaderofthosebooks[theBible],andhadreadthemthroughandthroughbeforeIwaseightyearsold;thatistosay,theOldTestament,fortheNewstruckmeasatask,buttheotherasapleasure。\"[1]OneoftheearliestbitsofhisworkisaparaphraseofoneofthePsalms。Hisphysicalinfirmityputhimatoddswiththeworld,whilehisstrikingbeautydrewtohimacrowdofadmirerswhohelpedtopoisoneveryspringofhisgenius。Evenso,heheldhislovefortheBible。WhileShelleyoftenspokeofitincontempt,whilehepridedhimselfonhisdivergencefromthepathofitsteaching,Byronneverdid。Hewanderedfar,buthealwaysknewit;and,thoughhecouldhardlyfindtermstoexpresshiscontemptfortheChurch,thereisnolineofByron\'swritingwhichisaslurattheBible。Ontheotherhand,muchofhisworkrevealsapassionforthebeautyofitaswellasitstruth。HismostmelodiouswritingisinthatgroupofHebrewmelodieswhichwerewrittentobesung。TheydemandfarmorethanapassingknowledgeoftheBiblebothfortheirwritingandtheirunderstanding。Thereisalonglistofthem,butnoonewithoutaknowledgeoftheBiblewouldhaveknownwhathemeantbyhispoem,\"TheHarptheMonarchMinstrelSwept。\"\"Jephtha\'sDaughter\"presumesuponaknowledgeoftheOldTestamentstorywhichwouldnotcometooneinapassingstudyoftheBible。\"TheSongofSaulBeforehisLastBattle\"andthepoemheaded\"Saul\" couldnothavebeenwritten,norcantheybereadintelligentlybyanyonewhodoesnotknowhisBible。AmongByron\'sdramas,twoofwhichhethoughtmost,were,\"HeavenandEarth\" and\"Cain。\"WhenhewasaccusedofpervertingtheScripturein\"Cain,\"herepliedthathehadonlytakentheScriptureatitsfacevalue。 BothofthedramasarenotonlybuiltdirectlyoutofScripturalevents,butimplyafarwiderknowledgeofScripturethantheirmeretitlessuggest。 [1]Taine,EnglishLiterature,II。,279。 Therearestrikingreferencesinmanyotherpoems,eveninhisalmostvilepoem,\"DonJuan。\"Themostnotableinstanceisinthefifteenthcanto,whereheisspeakingofpersecutedsagesandtheselinesoccur: \"Wasitnotso,greatLocke?andgreaterBacon? GreatSocrates?AndThouDivinerstill,Whoselotitisbymentobemistaken,AndThypurecreedmadesanctionofallill? Redeemingworldstobebybigotsshaken,HowwasThytoilrewarded?\" InanoteonthispassageByronsays:\"Asitisnecessaryinthesetimestoavoidambiguity,IsaythatImeanby\'Divinerstill\'Christ。IfeverGodwasman——ormanGod——Hewasboth。 IneverarraignedHiscreed,buttheuseorabuseofit。Mr。CanningonedayquotedChristianitytosanctionslavery,andMr。Wilberforcehadlittletosayinreply。AndwasChristcrucifiedthatblackmenmightbescourged?Ifso,Hehadbetterbeenbornamulatto,togivebothcolorsanequalchanceoffreedom,oratleastsalvation。\"ByroncouldlivefarfromtheinfluenceoftheBibleinhispersonallife;butheneverescapeditsinfluenceinhisliterarywork。 OfColeridgelessneedstobesaid,becausewethinkofhimsomuchintermsofhismoremeditativemusings,whichareoftenreligious。 HehimselftellsoflongandcarefulrereadingsoftheEnglishBibleuntilhecouldsay:IntheBible\"thereismorethatfindsmethanIhaveexperiencedinallotherbookstogether;thewordsoftheBiblefindmeatgreaterdepthsofmybeing。\"Ofcourse,thatwouldinfluencehiswriting,anditdid。Eveninthe\"RimeoftheAncientMariner\"muchofthephraseologyisScriptural。Whenthealbatrossdrewnear,\"AsifithadbeenaChristiansoul,WehaileditinGod\'sname。\" WhenthemarinerslepthegavepraisetoMary,QueenofHeaven。Hesoughttheshrivingofthehermit-priest。Heendsthestorybecausehehears\"thelittlevesperbell\"whichbidshimtoprayer。Whenyoureadhis\"HymnBeforeSunriseintheValeofChamounix\"youfindyourselfreadingtheNineteenthPsalm。HecallsonthemotionlesstorrentsandthesilentcataractsandthegreatMontBlancitselftopraiseGod。ColeridgeneverhadseenChamounix,norMontBlanc,noraglacier,butheknewhisBible。SohehashisChristmasCarolalongwithalltherest。HispoemoftheMoorsaftertheCivilWarunderPhilipII。isScripturalinitsphraseology,andsoismuchelsethathewrote。 Franklyandwillinglyheyieldedtoitsinfluence。 Inhis\"TableTalk\"heoftenreferstothevalueoftheBibleintheformingofliterarystyle。Oncehesaid:\"IntensestudyoftheBiblewillkeepanywriterfrombeingvulgarinpointofstyle。\"[1] [1]June14,1830。 TheverymentionofColeridgemakesonethinkofWordsworth。TheyhadaDamonandPythiasfriendship。TheWordsworthswerepoor;theyhadonlyseventypoundsayear,andtheywerenotashamed。Coleridgecalledthemthehappiestfamilyheeversaw。WordsworthwasnotnarrowlyaChristianpoet,hewasnotalwaysseekingtoputChristiandogmaintopoetry,butthroughouthewasexpressingtheChristianspiritwhichhehadlearnedfromtheBible。HispoetrywasonelongprotestagainstbanishingGodfromtheuniverse。Itwasliterallytrueofhimthat\"themeanestflowerthatgrowscangivethoughtsthattoooftenlietoodeepfortears。\"Ifthiswerethetimetobecritical,onewouldthinkthattoomuchwassometimesmadeofveryminuteoccurrences;butthistendencytogetbackoftheeventandseehowGodismovingislearnedbestfromScripture,whereWordsworthhimselflearnedit。Ifyoureadhis\"IntimationsofImmortality,\"orthe\"OdetoDuty,\"or\"TinternAbbay,\"oreventheratherlabored\"Excursion,\"youfindyourselfundertheScripturalinfluence。 ThereremainsinthisGeorgiangroupthegreatprosemaster,WalterScott。Mr。GladstonesaidhethoughtScottthegreatestofhiscountrymen。JohnMorleysuggestedJohnKnoxinstead。Mr。Gladstonereplied:\"No,thelinemustbedrawnfirmlybetweenthewriterandthemanofaction——nocomparisonthere。\"[1]HewentontosaythatBurnsisveryfineandtrue,nodoubt,\"buttoimagineawholegroupofcharacters,tomarshalthem,tosetthemtowork,andtosustaintheaction,Imustcountthatthetestofhighestandmostdiversifiedquality。\"AllwhoarefondofScottwillrealizehowconstantlythesceneswhichheisdescribinggroupthemselvesaroundreligiousobservances,howoftenmenareheldincheckfromdeedsofviolencebyreligiousconception。ManyofthesescenescrystallizearoundaScripturalevent。